Based on 2006 results, here's some SBT links:
North Dakota State University (Midwest Confernce)
http://www.acm.ndsu.nodak.edu/~amersoci/STEEL%20BRIDGE.htm
SUNY Canton (Upstate New York)
http://www.canton.edu/public_relations/news/bridge_team_finals.html
University of Wisconsin, Madison (Great Lakes)
http://www.engr.wisc.edu/studentorgs/bridge/
Georgia Tech University (Carolinas)
http://asce.ce.gatech.edu/
Lakehead University (Midwest)
http://www.luess.com/
(couldn't find much else)
Clemson University (Carolinas)
http://www.ce.clemson.edu/steelbridge/home.html
University of California, San Diego (Pacific Southwest)
http://scse.ucsd.edu/steel_bridge/index.html
California State University, Chico (Mid-Pacific)
http://chicoasce.googlepages.com/activities.html
University of California, Davis (Mid-Pacific)
http://asce.ucdavis.edu/
Lawrence Technological University (North Central)
http://www.ltu.edu/engineering/civil/.asp
(again, not much here)
University of California, Berkeley (Mid-Pacific)
http://www.ce.berkeley.edu/~steelbridge/new/index.php
Michigan State University (North Central)
http://www.egr.msu.edu/asce/index.html
Gonzaga University (Pacific Northwest)
http://www.gonzaga.edu/
Southern Polytechnic State University (Southeast)
http://asce.spsu.edu/ASCE/Steel%20Bridge.html
University of Missouri, Kansas City (Mid-Continent)
http://www.sce.umkc.edu/cme/ascesteel_cme/default.htm
Virginia Tech (Virginias)
http://www.asce.cee.vt.edu/bridge.html
University of North Florida (Southeast)
http://www.unf.edu/groups/asce/
University of Hawaii, Manoa (Pacific Southwest)
http://www.eng.hawaii.edu/~asce/
New Jersey Institute of Technology (Metropolitan)
http://web.njit.edu/~asce/index_files/Page713.htm
Hudson Valley Community College (Upstate New York)
https://www.hvcc.edu/studentactivities/clubact.html
Texas A & M University, College State (Texas-Mexico)
http://asce.tamu.edu/
Cal Poly San Luis Obispo (Pacific Southwest)
http://ceenve.calpoly.edu/sce/
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale (Mid-Continent)
http://civil.engr.siu.edu/ASCE/bridge.htm
Texas A & M University, Kingsville (Texas-Mexico)
http://www.engineer.tamuk.edu/Homepage/
Oregon Institute of Technology (Pacific Northwest)
http://asce.southslopewebdesign.com/bridge.html
Lafayette College (Mid-Atlantic)
http://www.lafayette.edu/news.php/view/9760
The Ohio State University (Ohio Valley)
http://www-ceg.eng.ohio-state.edu/steelbridge/
Kansas State University aka "Steel Willie" (Mid-Continent)
http://www.engg.ksu.edu/ASCE/index_files/Page554.htm
University of Maine (New England)
http://www.civil.umaine.edu/steelbridge/
University of Connecticut (New England)
http://www.engr.uconn.edu/~ceeasce/sb.htm
Utah State University (Rocky Mountain)
http://www.engineering.usu.edu/clubs/asce/
Old Dominion University (Virginias)
http://asce.odu.edu/
Arkansas State University (Deep South)
http://engr.astate.edu/asce/
Colorado School of Mines (Rocky Mountain)
http://www.mines.edu/stu_life/organ/asce/steel/
University of British Columbia (Pacific Northwest)
The Underground is the best student civil engineering publication!
http://www.civil.ubc.ca/civlclub/index2.php?language=english
University of Utah (Rocky Mountain)
http://www.civil.utah.edu/~asce/
Univrersity of Texas, Austin (Texas-Mexico)
http://www.ut-asce.org/
Tennessee Technological University (Southeast)
http://www.tntech.edu/cee/Student_Orgs.html
Youngstown State University (Ohio Valley)
http://www.ysu.edu/stu_org/asce/
Univrersity of Delaware (Mid-Atlantic)
http://www.ce.udel.edu/~asce/index-frames.html
University of Illinois, Chicago (Great Lakes)
http://www2.uic.edu/stud_orgs/prof/asce/main.htm
NYC College of Technology (Metropolitan)
http://www.citytech.cuny.edu/academics/deptsites/
Ecole de Technologie Superieure
http://www.ctn.etsmtl.ca/pontacier/
Louisiana State University (Deep South)
http://www.ceedept.lsu.edu/~asce/
Other Teams of note:
University of Florida (Southeast -- The Gators
will win the Southeast this year)
http://www.ufasce.com/steelbridge/index.html
Penn State (Mid-Atlantic)
http://www.engr.psu.edu/ASCE/Bridge/index.htm
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (Great Lakes)
http://cee.uiuc.edu/groups/asce/projects/default.asp#bridge
University of Alaska, Fairbanks (Pacific Northwest)
http://www.uaf.edu/asce/
California State University, Long Beach (Pacific Southwest)
http://www.csulb.edu/org/asce/mmindex.htm
Illinois Institute of Technology (Great Lakes)
http://asce.iit.edu/
California State University, Northridge (Pacific Southwest - 2007 NSSBC Host)
http://www.csun.edu/~ceam/home.htm
Iowa State University (Midwest)
http://www.stuorg.iastate.edu/asce/steelbridge.htm
University of Michigan (North Central)
http://www.engin.umich.edu/soc/asce/
Oklahoma State University (Mid-Continent)
http://asce.ceat.okstate.edu/
Portland State University (Pacific Northwest)
http://www.asce.pdx.edu/bridgeteam/Home.html
University of South Florida (Southeast)
http://org.eng.usf.edu/ASCE/
Clarkson University (Upstate New York)
http://www.clarkson.edu/projects/asce/Steel%20Bridge%20Page.htm
Thursday, March 01, 2007
DK TIGGIN'
Nothin' but DK Tiggin' today and tomorrow. The first pair looks great, let's just get through more of them each hour. This bridge is going to be very efficient if we keep this up guys, really tight stuff, but remember, we gotta be fast, so let's expedite the process these next 20 days.

JUST DO IT
BABY!

JUST DO IT
BABY!
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
State of the Chrome Union
February is almost over, holy schnikies!!!
The LT has been completely precision milled, and the frame 45's are ready to weld, so we can get the total LT frame jigged up and welded for each DK piece. 45 + 45 = 90, so that's real nice to know!!! Phil's gonna MIG the Ojos seeing how the TIG just seems too much of a burden.
Left to do: Plenty of various Doves.
Sheet metal work, caps and such, maybe more for Phil if we finish early.
Finish the OT, cut, prec. mill, weld the last sections up.
Lathework galore, OT and DK.
Gladiator work should be done on the lathe to speed things up.
Keep going Chrome-O's, the finish is nigh!


The LT has been completely precision milled, and the frame 45's are ready to weld, so we can get the total LT frame jigged up and welded for each DK piece. 45 + 45 = 90, so that's real nice to know!!! Phil's gonna MIG the Ojos seeing how the TIG just seems too much of a burden.
Left to do: Plenty of various Doves.
Sheet metal work, caps and such, maybe more for Phil if we finish early.
Finish the OT, cut, prec. mill, weld the last sections up.
Lathework galore, OT and DK.
Gladiator work should be done on the lathe to speed things up.
Keep going Chrome-O's, the finish is nigh!

Sunday, February 25, 2007
Bucky Bridge Ready to Rumble.
2/24/07

Construction commenced in Farmer's Paradise. Mike, Amy, Jessica, CQ and Jeff took a stab at it as the "Chrome Crew" practiced a bit with the 2005 bridge. Captains taught the basics of dovetail treatment and transport first so no unnecessary fractures took place. After that, they went through beam assembly theory and got acquainted with all the crap in the way on the 2007 site. Revetments suck. The 9'-0" river, however, will prove to be a good compromise.
Now looking east:
Hello Wisconsin!
The University of Wisconsin, Madison Steel Bridge Team is all done with their bridge, and ready to hit the construction site. No doubt the blood, sweat, and tears were pouring out at Endres. Keep working hard Badgers, and you'll be California Dreamin' before you know it! A big "sweet jumps" to y'all!
"After weeks of intense work, little sleep, and mysterious sickness, we have a bridge, and boy, is it beautiful. On to construction practice!"

Saturday, February 24, 2007
Quote of the...YEAR!
"Every year, a school comes up with a strategy that couldn’t possibly be done on a real construction project, and we want to keep it realistic,” - Frank Hatfield, head of the NSSBC rules committee.
"Open your mind. The world isn't what it was. We all need to evolve - learn from the student as the student learns from the master. New, fresh ideas are all around us. Listen, observe, think and go forth into the great wide open. We know less than we think." - anonymous

"Open your mind. The world isn't what it was. We all need to evolve - learn from the student as the student learns from the master. New, fresh ideas are all around us. Listen, observe, think and go forth into the great wide open. We know less than we think." - anonymous
Friday, February 23, 2007
REGIONAL ASCE / STEEL BRIDGE CONFERENCE WEBLINKS 2007
FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE:
TEX-MEX (COMPLETED) - REGIONAL CHAMP: TEXAS A&M AGGIES
HOST: TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY
LOCATION: LUBBOCK, TX
DATES: JANUARY 12-13
http://www.asce.ce.ttu.edu/
MIDWEST (COMPLETED) - REGIONAL CHAMP: NDSU BISON
HOST: MINNESOTA STATE, MANKATO
LOCATION: MANKATO, MN
DATES: MARCH 9-10
http://krypton.mnsu.edu/~asce/Regional%20Conference%2007.htm
NEW ENGLAND (COMPLETED) = REGIONAL CHAMP: MERRIMACK WARRIORS
HOST: UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT
LOCATION: STORRS, CT
DATES: MARCH 15-17
http://nesteelbridge2007.engr.uconn.edu/
DEEP SOUTH
HOST: LOUISIANA TECH - - REGIONAL CHAMP: ASU INDIANS? (MSU)
LOCATION: RUSTON, LA
DATES: MARCH 23-25
http://deepsouthconference.com/default.aspx
SOUTHEAST

HOST: UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE - REGIONAL CHAMP: UF GATORS
LOCATION: KNOXVILLE, TN
DATES: MARCH 29-31
http://conference2007.utkasce.org/
OHIO VALLEY - REGIONAL CHAMP: YOUNGSTOWN PENGUINS
HOST: THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
LOCATION: COLUMBUS, OH
DATES: MARCH 30-APRIL 1
http://www.ceegs.ohio-state.edu/asce/ovrc.html
NORTH CENTRAL - REGIONAL CHAMP: LAWRENCE TECH BLUE DEVILS
HOST: MICHIGAN TECH UNIVERSITY
LOCATION: HOUGHTON, MI
DATES: MARCH 31-APRIL 2
http://www.cee.mtu.edu/asce/ncc2007/index.htm
PACIFIC SOUTHWEST - REGIONAL CHAMP: CSUN MATADORS

HOST: UC SAN DIEGO
LOCATION: SAN DIEGO, CA
DATES: APRIL 12-14
http://scse.ucsd.edu/Pages/pswrc07/
CAROLINAS - REGIONAL CHAMP: GEORGIA TECH YELLOW JACKETS
HOST: GEORGIA TECH
LOCATION: ATLANTA, GA
DATES: APRIL 12-14
http://asce.ce.gatech.edu/conference.html
PACIFIC NORTHWEST - REGIONAL CHAMP: PORTLAND STATE VIKINGS
HOST: UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA, FAIRBANKS
LOCATION: FAIRBANKS, AK
DATES: APRIL 12-14
http://www.alaska.edu/uaf/cem/steelbridge/
METROPOLITAN - REGIONAL CHAMP: NJIT HIGHLANDERS
HOST: NYC COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY
LOCATION: NEW YORK CITY
DATES: APRIL 13-14
http://www.ascemetro2007.com/competitions.html
ROCKY MOUNTAIN - REGIONAL CHAMP: WYOMING COWBOYS
HOST: UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, BOULDER
LOCATION: BOULDER, CO
DATES: APRIL 13-14
http://asce.colorado.edu/
UPSTATE NEW YORK - REGIONAL CHAMP: SUNY CANTON NORTHSTARS
HOST: CORNELL UNIVERSITY
LOCATION: ITHACA, NY
DATES: APRIL 13-14
http://ceeserver.cee.cornell.edu/asce/Conference/conference.html
VIRGINIAS - REGIONAL CHAMP: VIRGINIA TECH HOKIES

HOST: VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE
LOCATION: LEXINGTON, VA
DATES: APRIL 13-14
http://www.vmi.edu/asce/
MID-CONTINENT - REGIONAL CHAMP: UMKC KANGAROOS
HOST: UNIVRSITY OF KANSAS
LOCATION: LAWRENCE, KS
DATES: APRIL 26-28
http://kuasce.org/midcon07/
MID-PACIFIC - REGIONAL CHAMP: UC DAVIS AGGIES


HOST: SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY / SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY
LOCATION: SAN JOSE / SANTA CLARA, CA
DATES: APRIL 26-28
http://asce.engr.scu.edu/index.htm
GREAT LAKES - REGIONAL CHAMP: WISCONSIN BADGERS
HOST: PURDUE UNIVERSITY
LOCATION: WEST LAFAYETTE, IN
DATES: APRIL 27-28
http://cobweb.ecn.purdue.edu/%7Easce/reg07index.htm
MID-ATLANTIC - REGIONAL CHAMP: LAFAYETTE LEOPARDS
HOST: UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
LOCATION: COLLEGE PARK, MD
DATES: MAY 4-5
http://www.eng.umd.edu/organizations/asce/concrete_canoe.htm
TEX-MEX (COMPLETED) - REGIONAL CHAMP: TEXAS A&M AGGIES
HOST: TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY
LOCATION: LUBBOCK, TX
DATES: JANUARY 12-13
http://www.asce.ce.ttu.edu/
MIDWEST (COMPLETED) - REGIONAL CHAMP: NDSU BISON
HOST: MINNESOTA STATE, MANKATO
LOCATION: MANKATO, MN
DATES: MARCH 9-10
http://krypton.mnsu.edu/~asce/Regional%20Conference%2007.htm
NEW ENGLAND (COMPLETED) = REGIONAL CHAMP: MERRIMACK WARRIORS
HOST: UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT
LOCATION: STORRS, CT
DATES: MARCH 15-17
http://nesteelbridge2007.engr.uconn.edu/
DEEP SOUTH
HOST: LOUISIANA TECH - - REGIONAL CHAMP: ASU INDIANS? (MSU)
LOCATION: RUSTON, LA
DATES: MARCH 23-25
http://deepsouthconference.com/default.aspx
SOUTHEAST
HOST: UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE - REGIONAL CHAMP: UF GATORS
LOCATION: KNOXVILLE, TN
DATES: MARCH 29-31
http://conference2007.utkasce.org/
OHIO VALLEY - REGIONAL CHAMP: YOUNGSTOWN PENGUINS
HOST: THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
LOCATION: COLUMBUS, OH
DATES: MARCH 30-APRIL 1
http://www.ceegs.ohio-state.edu/asce/ovrc.html
NORTH CENTRAL - REGIONAL CHAMP: LAWRENCE TECH BLUE DEVILS
HOST: MICHIGAN TECH UNIVERSITY
LOCATION: HOUGHTON, MI
DATES: MARCH 31-APRIL 2
http://www.cee.mtu.edu/asce/ncc2007/index.htm
PACIFIC SOUTHWEST - REGIONAL CHAMP: CSUN MATADORS
HOST: UC SAN DIEGO
LOCATION: SAN DIEGO, CA
DATES: APRIL 12-14
http://scse.ucsd.edu/Pages/pswrc07/
CAROLINAS - REGIONAL CHAMP: GEORGIA TECH YELLOW JACKETS
HOST: GEORGIA TECH
LOCATION: ATLANTA, GA
DATES: APRIL 12-14
http://asce.ce.gatech.edu/conference.html
PACIFIC NORTHWEST - REGIONAL CHAMP: PORTLAND STATE VIKINGS
HOST: UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA, FAIRBANKS
LOCATION: FAIRBANKS, AK
DATES: APRIL 12-14
http://www.alaska.edu/uaf/cem/steelbridge/
METROPOLITAN - REGIONAL CHAMP: NJIT HIGHLANDERS
HOST: NYC COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY
LOCATION: NEW YORK CITY
DATES: APRIL 13-14
http://www.ascemetro2007.com/competitions.html
ROCKY MOUNTAIN - REGIONAL CHAMP: WYOMING COWBOYS
HOST: UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, BOULDER
LOCATION: BOULDER, CO
DATES: APRIL 13-14
http://asce.colorado.edu/
UPSTATE NEW YORK - REGIONAL CHAMP: SUNY CANTON NORTHSTARS
HOST: CORNELL UNIVERSITY
LOCATION: ITHACA, NY
DATES: APRIL 13-14
http://ceeserver.cee.cornell.edu/asce/Conference/conference.html
VIRGINIAS - REGIONAL CHAMP: VIRGINIA TECH HOKIES
HOST: VIRGINIA MILITARY INSTITUTE
LOCATION: LEXINGTON, VA
DATES: APRIL 13-14
http://www.vmi.edu/asce/
MID-CONTINENT - REGIONAL CHAMP: UMKC KANGAROOS
HOST: UNIVRSITY OF KANSAS
LOCATION: LAWRENCE, KS
DATES: APRIL 26-28
http://kuasce.org/midcon07/
MID-PACIFIC - REGIONAL CHAMP: UC DAVIS AGGIES
HOST: SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY / SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY
LOCATION: SAN JOSE / SANTA CLARA, CA
DATES: APRIL 26-28
http://asce.engr.scu.edu/index.htm
GREAT LAKES - REGIONAL CHAMP: WISCONSIN BADGERS
HOST: PURDUE UNIVERSITY
LOCATION: WEST LAFAYETTE, IN
DATES: APRIL 27-28
http://cobweb.ecn.purdue.edu/%7Easce/reg07index.htm
MID-ATLANTIC - REGIONAL CHAMP: LAFAYETTE LEOPARDS
HOST: UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
LOCATION: COLLEGE PARK, MD
DATES: MAY 4-5
http://www.eng.umd.edu/organizations/asce/concrete_canoe.htm
Bison fashions an updated look!
2006 defending Champs pimp their page a little. There's a good article by Lena Singer on the 2006 NSSBC in Salt Lake City here - Ong Bak and Jeremy made the photo section while practicing in the downtown skating rink. Revell gets the quote, an all too true quote regarding the sleep vs. time to competition curve eh?
Awesome stuff! Good Luck in Mankato NDSU!
http://www.acm.ndsu.nodak.edu/%7Eamersoci/STEEL%20BRIDGE.htm
Awesome stuff! Good Luck in Mankato NDSU!
http://www.acm.ndsu.nodak.edu/%7Eamersoci/STEEL%20BRIDGE.htm
Sabado - 2/24
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
Midwest Conference Gearing Up!
The Midwest Regional Steel Bridge Competition is all set to fire on from March 9-10. Matt has decided to kill two birds with one stone by seeing some ole' high school amigos while in Minneapolis and heading down to Mankato for the competition that Saturday. Should be good to see what this very competitive conference comes up with. In the Midwest include the defending 2006 NSSBC Champs in the North Dakota State University Bison, perennial Canadian contender Lakehead University, the always fast assembly of Iowa State, and a slowly emerging University of North Dakota Steel Bridge Team. Others in the contest will include, Iowa, Minnesota State-Mankato, South Dakota State and the University of Wisconsin-Platteville. Good Stuff!
The Golden Gophers are on top of things, and have their bridge done ahead of schedule, and apparently in far better shape than typically anticipated. Looks like a solid "Spider Leg Warren", nice design, should show solid numbers with good connections. Note the deeper deck and lateral "diamond" truss alongside it, good for lateral rigidity, and helps reduce the amount of members put on the bridge. Only see maybe 2 or 3 lateral braces over the span, a few up top, and two at the piers of course, looks good!




Link to the 2006-2007 Golden Gopher effort:
http://www.tc.umn.edu/~asce/bridge/
Some other Midwest Conference SBT's:
Minnesota State University-Mankato (2007 MW Regional Host)
http://krypton.mnsu.edu/~asce/
North Dakota State University
http://www.acm.ndsu.nodak.edu/~amersoci/STEEL%20BRIDGE.htm
South Dakota State University
http://learn.sdstate.edu/ASCE/Steel%20Bridge/STEELBRIDGE2006.htm
University of Wisconain-Platteville
http://www.uwplatt.edu/org/asce/
University of Iowa
http://css.engineering.uiowa.edu/~asce/steelnews.htm
University of North Dakota
http://www.und.nodak.edu/misc/sem/ce/cestudactivities.html
Lakehead University
http://www.luess.com/
Iowa State University
http://www.stuorg.iastate.edu/asce/steelbridge.htm
Still pluggin' away here, this is bridge has so many details it's hard to keep track of them all, but piece by piece it's starting to really turn into something special. Keep on Aggin' Chrome Ollie!
The Golden Gophers are on top of things, and have their bridge done ahead of schedule, and apparently in far better shape than typically anticipated. Looks like a solid "Spider Leg Warren", nice design, should show solid numbers with good connections. Note the deeper deck and lateral "diamond" truss alongside it, good for lateral rigidity, and helps reduce the amount of members put on the bridge. Only see maybe 2 or 3 lateral braces over the span, a few up top, and two at the piers of course, looks good!
Link to the 2006-2007 Golden Gopher effort:
http://www.tc.umn.edu/~asce/bridge/
Some other Midwest Conference SBT's:
Minnesota State University-Mankato (2007 MW Regional Host)
http://krypton.mnsu.edu/~asce/
North Dakota State University
http://www.acm.ndsu.nodak.edu/~amersoci/STEEL%20BRIDGE.htm
South Dakota State University
http://learn.sdstate.edu/ASCE/Steel%20Bridge/STEELBRIDGE2006.htm
University of Wisconain-Platteville
http://www.uwplatt.edu/org/asce/
University of Iowa
http://css.engineering.uiowa.edu/~asce/steelnews.htm
University of North Dakota
http://www.und.nodak.edu/misc/sem/ce/cestudactivities.html
Lakehead University
http://www.luess.com/
Iowa State University
http://www.stuorg.iastate.edu/asce/steelbridge.htm
Still pluggin' away here, this is bridge has so many details it's hard to keep track of them all, but piece by piece it's starting to really turn into something special. Keep on Aggin' Chrome Ollie!
Monday, February 19, 2007
The knee bone's connected to the...
Oooooooh Lordy!
Alright, Sr. Tomás Bell is on the prowl. The DK doves need to be welded to the DK frames on the Tinius beam. Usually this takes a while, but nobody inserts less heat and gets more strength in Davis, CA then Tom Bell, so thanks for that. Setups will need to be conducted to get Tom in and out as fast as possible. Need to move the Tinius beam within range of the Miller TIG.

Besides the obvious need to start getting the DK's together, we have some joint angles on the OT that need to be TIGged. In the student shop we can cut and finish precision milling just about all the LT stuff, the LAT's, the PIER bases, the PIER DK Frames, and the Chrome Stone atop the whole enchilada.
Construction Team needs to step in and get busy, we don't want the learning curve to be too steep come April. The Assembly stakes for this season will be much higher than the Clan had to deal with, so get busy and get comfortable with it all starting this Saturday.

"Life is like riding a bike. It is impossible to maintain your balance while standing still." - Linda Brakeall (funny name for such a quote...)
Alright, Sr. Tomás Bell is on the prowl. The DK doves need to be welded to the DK frames on the Tinius beam. Usually this takes a while, but nobody inserts less heat and gets more strength in Davis, CA then Tom Bell, so thanks for that. Setups will need to be conducted to get Tom in and out as fast as possible. Need to move the Tinius beam within range of the Miller TIG.
Besides the obvious need to start getting the DK's together, we have some joint angles on the OT that need to be TIGged. In the student shop we can cut and finish precision milling just about all the LT stuff, the LAT's, the PIER bases, the PIER DK Frames, and the Chrome Stone atop the whole enchilada.
Construction Team needs to step in and get busy, we don't want the learning curve to be too steep come April. The Assembly stakes for this season will be much higher than the Clan had to deal with, so get busy and get comfortable with it all starting this Saturday.
"Life is like riding a bike. It is impossible to maintain your balance while standing still." - Linda Brakeall (funny name for such a quote...)
Monday, February 12, 2007
Monday, February 05, 2007
DK's in the house
Okay, the DK frames have been welded up and Philthy Phil is just about done burning through the A.G.S. DT's. This means when we get the Tinius beam back from 104L we'll get Sr. Tomas Bell on the payroll Tiggin' some sweet shizzle, hopefully. Minimizing set up time we'll be paramount as we'll try to take advantage of every hour from 8am-noon/1pm-5pm. Cranks will have to be welded to main structural members on top of the A.G.S.ers, so we'll need those ready.
In the meantime we have a ton of structural features to precision mill and we still have to cut/precision mill the OT, which will take a delicate touch due to it's Eulerian geometry.
Hang in the Fab Crew - it's a new dawn it's a new day, second wind's coming around...
In the meantime we have a ton of structural features to precision mill and we still have to cut/precision mill the OT, which will take a delicate touch due to it's Eulerian geometry.
Hang in the Fab Crew - it's a new dawn it's a new day, second wind's coming around...
Sunday, January 28, 2007
Saturday went well
Good turnout yesterday. The welding of the decks seemed to take longer than maybe it should've but 4 more are done regardless. Ole' Miggy though seems to be leaking so on Monday will have Mr. Tom Bell get a look at 'er and hopefully we can get back to business by Monday afternoon.
Lots of pieces still have to be precision milled, and we have plenty of connection work to still complete. Phil and Jessica will work the mills this week, Phil on the DK doves, and Jessica precision milling most likely. Charmine is about a day away from shop certification, so her and Jessica will do the ever so important angled cuts, and the entire OT which will requre some real money cuts. Remember, anything that's angled on one side yet flat on the other can be precision milled just the same, only from one side.
Lots to do, keep at it, no sleep 'til Brooklyn, er San Jo.

"Imagination is more important than knowledge." - Albert Einstein
Lots of pieces still have to be precision milled, and we have plenty of connection work to still complete. Phil and Jessica will work the mills this week, Phil on the DK doves, and Jessica precision milling most likely. Charmine is about a day away from shop certification, so her and Jessica will do the ever so important angled cuts, and the entire OT which will requre some real money cuts. Remember, anything that's angled on one side yet flat on the other can be precision milled just the same, only from one side.
Lots to do, keep at it, no sleep 'til Brooklyn, er San Jo.

"Imagination is more important than knowledge." - Albert Einstein
Thursday, January 25, 2007
Tex-Mex and Da Bulls are already ready...
Hey everybody!
Word in from the 2007 Tex-Mex ASCE Regional Conference Steel Bridge Competition hosted by Texas Tech in Lubbock:
1. Texas A & M University, College Station - invited to Northridge
2. U. of Texas, Austin - invited to Northridge
3. Texas A & M University, Kingsville
Link to the Longhorn effort here:
http://www.caee.utexas.edu/newsreader.cfm?articlePK
=359&namedpagePK=1&articleType=externalNews


Might have been a little controversy, but all things put aside, the A&M Aggies and the Longhorns are headed to Northridge.
Also, the University of South Florida is on a mission to "stay ahead of the game", just like Mr. Cannon would do. They've already got their puente ready for the SE Regional in Knoxville at the University of Tennessee. Good stiffness numbers
reported!
http://groups.google.com/group/usf-ascebridge




Word in from the 2007 Tex-Mex ASCE Regional Conference Steel Bridge Competition hosted by Texas Tech in Lubbock:
1. Texas A & M University, College Station - invited to Northridge
2. U. of Texas, Austin - invited to Northridge
3. Texas A & M University, Kingsville
Link to the Longhorn effort here:
http://www.caee.utexas.edu/newsreader.cfm?articlePK
=359&namedpagePK=1&articleType=externalNews



Might have been a little controversy, but all things put aside, the A&M Aggies and the Longhorns are headed to Northridge.
Also, the University of South Florida is on a mission to "stay ahead of the game", just like Mr. Cannon would do. They've already got their puente ready for the SE Regional in Knoxville at the University of Tennessee. Good stiffness numbers
reported!
http://groups.google.com/group/usf-ascebridge
Wednesday, January 24, 2007
Deck Saturday 1/27
Only about 90 days from MidPac now Aggies.
This Saturday, we will push to get the whole deck frame completed. Jess, Phil and Jennifer have been working all day today after the career faire. We'll have plenty to do on Saturday, and we'll find stuff to do we didn't know we had to do no doubt.

(...Watchu lookin' at?)
This Saturday, we will push to get the whole deck frame completed. Jess, Phil and Jennifer have been working all day today after the career faire. We'll have plenty to do on Saturday, and we'll find stuff to do we didn't know we had to do no doubt.
(...Watchu lookin' at?)
Friday, January 19, 2007
Thursday, January 18, 2007
January 18+
Steel cutting is going down now, most of the straight cuts have been made to the deck and crank connections. We've still got to cut the lightwall chords and the Overtruss which will get double, double checked before we get into it. Work is going on so stick around and see how the bridge gets made everybody. Phil and Jessica in the shop as well, so shadow them and see the money cuts on the mill.

Jessica's going to precision mill two flanges and get some webbing cut so we can make our first beam pieces this Saturday -- so long as we get the Tinius beam in 1203.
Matt will cut some more in 1203 after Fiber Polymer Reinforced Concrete class this afternoon. Say 5 p.m. to 9 p.m. - then go grab a burrito down at Guad.
Vote for your theme!
Chro...............so many possibilities.
Peace.
Tuesday, January 16, 2007
Tuesday, January 09, 2007
The January Surge
When the steel gets in we will go to work immediately on the deck. We'll need rough cuts, about 1/8" over, then we will precision mill those lengths in the student shop during open hours. Anything light wall can be wheeled, which we can do in the lab, and even more so if we manage to find an Ellis for our own use. If anybody has a saw capable of cutting steel in a variety of forms, i.e. bar, tube, rod etc. then bring it in so we can get use out of it.
Dovetail programming and production will be the highest priority as they set the standard for our connection stiffness, which in turn equals our bridge stiffness. Deck will come first, the the super stuff, then the LT stuff. While the programming and all that other jazz goes down, we do need to cut a shiteload of blanks and precision mill them down. Lengths to rough cut are +1/8" actual size.
In the meantime, while the major shipment is being waited on -- we need to make special tools for the practice campaign. These tools will mimic our 2007 assembly procedure and hopefully, might even be modifiable for our campaign this year. The practice will help new construction team members get familiar with DT's, the site, etc. etc. Need to use our time wisely, no breaks, we need to work and get it done, quickly and precisely.
Go Ags!
Dovetail programming and production will be the highest priority as they set the standard for our connection stiffness, which in turn equals our bridge stiffness. Deck will come first, the the super stuff, then the LT stuff. While the programming and all that other jazz goes down, we do need to cut a shiteload of blanks and precision mill them down. Lengths to rough cut are +1/8" actual size.
In the meantime, while the major shipment is being waited on -- we need to make special tools for the practice campaign. These tools will mimic our 2007 assembly procedure and hopefully, might even be modifiable for our campaign this year. The practice will help new construction team members get familiar with DT's, the site, etc. etc. Need to use our time wisely, no breaks, we need to work and get it done, quickly and precisely.
Go Ags!
Tuesday, December 19, 2006
Here Comes Santa Claus...
Well, Chromalypto is about to set in...YES!!!
"YES!"

Why did Santiago Calatrava design a bridge in Redding?
It's now officially fab season, and you know what that means, steel splinters in the finger tips, ooo, yes!!!
"YES!"
You got it buddy.
Okay, the steel will be here shortly, mostly from Pennsylvania hopefully, CTV and Co. permitting, if not, we'll take in what we can to get started from Southern Illinois.
We need to mainly cut and precision mill all lengths first. Remember on the flanges to look for the bow and put that bow in the "deflection direction" i.e. the one that goes up and down on the bridge. If you we cut and clamp a flange that is warped in the lateral direction, it will warp the deck and make connections a bother. Better to prestress/weld the flange in the up and down direction. Milled slots will need to be in the up and down direction as well. Check with Matt before you mill a deck slot on any flange.
Phil will hopefully set up the dovetail mill program tomorrow. Matt will be there for about an hour or so before he has to jet for work. Need to get that order in before Friday the 22nd from PA. UPS baby! Let's get the maturl here.
Feliz Navidad Amigos! Relax while you can, it's relentless 'til April in San Jo!

Why did Santiago Calatrava design a bridge in Redding?
Sunday, December 10, 2006
Sunday, December 03, 2006
D Week 12/3+
Howdy Y'all,
Saturday was a great day for us! We got solid, reliable numbers for all 12 design variations, now Jessica and Matt will look at the models, double check the weights, deflections, load placements etc. etc. and Tuesday night we'll have a vigorous discussion on what we think the best choice will be. Depth vs. Chordage? Speed vs. a bit lighter and/or stiffer? Cold decisions come from the scoring, so we'll need some good thought this week to make decision we all feel comfortable with. The good thing is, every design choice we have is a good bridge. Veterans will use their past season's experience during the fabrication rounds to help steer the way to our best choice.
Until then, finish strong in Bridge, finish strong in the classroom.
Saturday was a great day for us! We got solid, reliable numbers for all 12 design variations, now Jessica and Matt will look at the models, double check the weights, deflections, load placements etc. etc. and Tuesday night we'll have a vigorous discussion on what we think the best choice will be. Depth vs. Chordage? Speed vs. a bit lighter and/or stiffer? Cold decisions come from the scoring, so we'll need some good thought this week to make decision we all feel comfortable with. The good thing is, every design choice we have is a good bridge. Veterans will use their past season's experience during the fabrication rounds to help steer the way to our best choice.
Until then, finish strong in Bridge, finish strong in the classroom.
Thursday, November 30, 2006
...for in the final analysis...
What's happenin' everyone!
Tests and Projects beating you down? That's okay, we'll procrastinate with a design session Friday night and a full day of Chrome Ollie stuff on Saturday!!!
Okay, so, here is the earth, I mean...We'll be meeting Friday night at Matt's place on Brandywine to discuss the options we have to analyze on Saturday. Our priliminary analyses show what are the likely best cases for all bridges. Friday night we will finalize all design features for each bridge that WILL be made for each design. So, for instance, if one bridge has a shallow deck, it will have a wide lateral truss, if it has a deep deck, it may have a tri-lateral truss, or we may put more DK to DK laterals in it (separate members). Either way, these decisions need to be made so we can get a dead nuts accuracy on what features will be fabricated for each bridge. Most importantly, we'll talk about constructability of each design.
On Saturday we will of course be moving our gear down to the fabrication level below the Loft so the construction boys can have their way with the wall and the staircase. This will only improve productivity. We will make brand new models from up to date DXF's in SAP, and analyze our previously recorded best results for each bridge. Right now there are 6 main designs (including a new one we haven't analyzed just yet) we are going through, each has 2 flange variations, so that makes 12 models we'll have to make from scratch on Saturday. Be ready to get into it, we may have to assign 2 bridges per person.
Matt will be in charge of making the DXF's. Team members, especially returners, will be responsible for making decisions on what will go into each design. Everyone will be responsible for analysis on Saturday. Let's be methodical and cold, and get it done with a numbing efficiency. We need clear numbers for each bridge so we can DECIDE.
After analysis, Phil and Matt, and anybody who wants to join in, will be TIGging model bridges out of steel. Each model will be approx. 2 feet long so we can get an idea of how everything looks in 3D (i.e. structural behaviour, assembly etc.). Should be fun. Phil and Matt will coordinate getting more steel to fabricate the models, which will consist of making a simple CAD model, getting dimensions and sizes set, cutting, grinding, and TIG welding the suckers together.
Okay, that's it, get ready to put forth one final analytical effort. ANY NEW DESIGNS ARE WELCOME, IF YOU HAVE AN IDEA, DON'T BE SHY.
It takes a vision to start something wonderful...

...but engineers to finish it.
Tests and Projects beating you down? That's okay, we'll procrastinate with a design session Friday night and a full day of Chrome Ollie stuff on Saturday!!!
Okay, so, here is the earth, I mean...We'll be meeting Friday night at Matt's place on Brandywine to discuss the options we have to analyze on Saturday. Our priliminary analyses show what are the likely best cases for all bridges. Friday night we will finalize all design features for each bridge that WILL be made for each design. So, for instance, if one bridge has a shallow deck, it will have a wide lateral truss, if it has a deep deck, it may have a tri-lateral truss, or we may put more DK to DK laterals in it (separate members). Either way, these decisions need to be made so we can get a dead nuts accuracy on what features will be fabricated for each bridge. Most importantly, we'll talk about constructability of each design.
On Saturday we will of course be moving our gear down to the fabrication level below the Loft so the construction boys can have their way with the wall and the staircase. This will only improve productivity. We will make brand new models from up to date DXF's in SAP, and analyze our previously recorded best results for each bridge. Right now there are 6 main designs (including a new one we haven't analyzed just yet) we are going through, each has 2 flange variations, so that makes 12 models we'll have to make from scratch on Saturday. Be ready to get into it, we may have to assign 2 bridges per person.
Matt will be in charge of making the DXF's. Team members, especially returners, will be responsible for making decisions on what will go into each design. Everyone will be responsible for analysis on Saturday. Let's be methodical and cold, and get it done with a numbing efficiency. We need clear numbers for each bridge so we can DECIDE.
After analysis, Phil and Matt, and anybody who wants to join in, will be TIGging model bridges out of steel. Each model will be approx. 2 feet long so we can get an idea of how everything looks in 3D (i.e. structural behaviour, assembly etc.). Should be fun. Phil and Matt will coordinate getting more steel to fabricate the models, which will consist of making a simple CAD model, getting dimensions and sizes set, cutting, grinding, and TIG welding the suckers together.
Okay, that's it, get ready to put forth one final analytical effort. ANY NEW DESIGNS ARE WELCOME, IF YOU HAVE AN IDEA, DON'T BE SHY.
It takes a vision to start something wonderful...Wednesday, November 22, 2006
Getting Down to it.
Last Saturday, or Causeway Saturday, we took a closer look at some of the trusses we've been analyzing. The Monster looked better with slightly modified flanges on the deck, it came out lighter and stiffer, so kudos there. The others were about the same, a little lighter, but not much else.
We also tried analyzing a multiple beam set, which didn't do so well, but if it's stiff enough, it might make it worthwhile. Matt's going to buy the beams for a field test as soon as he can (maybe...$$$ concern).
This Tuesday we had a Construction Rules Quiz, and it is evident that new Team members need to read the Rules more often and become more and more familiar with them as the season progresses. We also need to learn how to speak up! It's okay to talk and be vocal, if you aren't sure ask. Time to break out of the mental shell and be a real engineer. Talk, and with volume! ;-)
After the Construction Quiz we discussed some of the best bridges. New bridge ideas are dwindling, so we'll have to decide what it is we want to do with the ones we have. We have to think about, and possibly tinker with the assembly design, all of the following:
Constructability - # members, # bolts, reachability of certain nodes, risk potential, assembly location, connection type.
Lightness - weight of connections, weld weight, what needs more wall thickness, what can do with ultra-thin wall (i.e. web, wide OT)
Stiffness - Depth vs. beam-like truss vs. how stiff can we get a beam.
Lots of discussion coming up before we decide, be prepared to listen and state your beliefs.
We also tried analyzing a multiple beam set, which didn't do so well, but if it's stiff enough, it might make it worthwhile. Matt's going to buy the beams for a field test as soon as he can (maybe...$$$ concern).
This Tuesday we had a Construction Rules Quiz, and it is evident that new Team members need to read the Rules more often and become more and more familiar with them as the season progresses. We also need to learn how to speak up! It's okay to talk and be vocal, if you aren't sure ask. Time to break out of the mental shell and be a real engineer. Talk, and with volume! ;-)
After the Construction Quiz we discussed some of the best bridges. New bridge ideas are dwindling, so we'll have to decide what it is we want to do with the ones we have. We have to think about, and possibly tinker with the assembly design, all of the following:
Constructability - # members, # bolts, reachability of certain nodes, risk potential, assembly location, connection type.
Lightness - weight of connections, weld weight, what needs more wall thickness, what can do with ultra-thin wall (i.e. web, wide OT)
Stiffness - Depth vs. beam-like truss vs. how stiff can we get a beam.
Lots of discussion coming up before we decide, be prepared to listen and state your beliefs.

Wednesday, November 15, 2006
11/14 Notes and about Saturday 11/18
Hey Chrome-O's,
This Tuesday Jessica and Matt summarized what we've analyzed so far:
Bis Vs
Monstro
Everest
Chichen Itza
As of right now, the Everest Truss looks too unstable, and has safety issues for construction that, quite frankly we shouldn't have to worry about. We're trying to get a solid structure and minimize construction risk, as our construction score counts for quite a bit this season.
We also noted that weight is a big factor in our structural score, so all design will be on a diet plan to a certain extent. Roughly 75%, 25%, weight to deflection (if our deflection range is reasonable on average)
Think about construction in the meantime, we have to put this baby together in our best time ever if we're going to win at Mid-Pac. The 2005 effort was our best yet at 3 minutes 38 seconds, with an immense amount of practice mind you. Last season's effort was also very solid, but imagine how fast we'd have been if we didn't rebuild the entire overtruss after Mid-Pac. That's 3 more weeks of practice!!!
THERE WILL BE A COMPREHENSIVE CONSTRUCTION QUIZ ON TUESDAY NOV. 22ND!!! So be ready to answer question correctly -- there may even be rules pertaining to the clarifications on the AISC NSSBC competition page found here:
http://http://www.aisc.org/
(follow the links to student design competitions)
THIS SATURDAY 11/18:
Well, it's no secret to those that've been showing up. We're getting very efficient at analyzing, and with the turnout, we are ahead of schedule. This weekend, and this weekend only, will be the last effort to try new things. The weeks following will require some fine tuning, and narrowing the decision. Jessica and Matt will have models ready for input and analysis - there should be about 4 or 5 workable designs.
Sac State will be in town this Sat. We play at 1:05 p.m. at Toomey Field - All current students can get free tix so long as they show up early and check in with Aggie Pack on the East Side of the "Stadium" - 11 am would be safe, maybe even sooner, don't know how crazy everyone is going to be. Gates open at 11:45 a.m. - this game, the 53rd Annual Causeway Classic, will be televised (pause for laughter of the I-A university football schools reading) so that's an added bonus, tape the game, maybe see yo'self on tv.
Our analysis checks for this Saturday will include:
Monstro - with modified deck flanges, I-Beam NDSU style I guess you could say, but the geometric centroidal depth in SAP will go up 1/2". Sweet.
Big Vs - again with I-beam like tubular flanges.
Chichen Itza - with the new flanges again.
Matt will also develop his "Lowrider" beam deck - it will be a special case, and hopefully, he can organize a trial loading of the PDM Model very soon to see if it's worth it. This will be our first beam-style analysis.
BASIC rule of thumb for analysis to final product, is that the shallower your bridge is, the smaller the margin is for error. Deeper bridges tend to deflect closer to that analyzed. We may have to elevate the pin connections atop the piers for the beam to be effective.
Okay, ramble on! I know.
See you Saturday -- again, good luck with continuing mid-terms.
And so we design and analyze on! Remember to read the construction rules AND clarifications.

Having dreams is common, being crazy enough to make them reality, that's Chrome Ollie.
This Tuesday Jessica and Matt summarized what we've analyzed so far:
Bis Vs
Monstro
Everest
Chichen Itza
As of right now, the Everest Truss looks too unstable, and has safety issues for construction that, quite frankly we shouldn't have to worry about. We're trying to get a solid structure and minimize construction risk, as our construction score counts for quite a bit this season.
We also noted that weight is a big factor in our structural score, so all design will be on a diet plan to a certain extent. Roughly 75%, 25%, weight to deflection (if our deflection range is reasonable on average)
Think about construction in the meantime, we have to put this baby together in our best time ever if we're going to win at Mid-Pac. The 2005 effort was our best yet at 3 minutes 38 seconds, with an immense amount of practice mind you. Last season's effort was also very solid, but imagine how fast we'd have been if we didn't rebuild the entire overtruss after Mid-Pac. That's 3 more weeks of practice!!!
THERE WILL BE A COMPREHENSIVE CONSTRUCTION QUIZ ON TUESDAY NOV. 22ND!!! So be ready to answer question correctly -- there may even be rules pertaining to the clarifications on the AISC NSSBC competition page found here:
http://http://www.aisc.org/
(follow the links to student design competitions)
THIS SATURDAY 11/18:
Well, it's no secret to those that've been showing up. We're getting very efficient at analyzing, and with the turnout, we are ahead of schedule. This weekend, and this weekend only, will be the last effort to try new things. The weeks following will require some fine tuning, and narrowing the decision. Jessica and Matt will have models ready for input and analysis - there should be about 4 or 5 workable designs.
Sac State will be in town this Sat. We play at 1:05 p.m. at Toomey Field - All current students can get free tix so long as they show up early and check in with Aggie Pack on the East Side of the "Stadium" - 11 am would be safe, maybe even sooner, don't know how crazy everyone is going to be. Gates open at 11:45 a.m. - this game, the 53rd Annual Causeway Classic, will be televised (pause for laughter of the I-A university football schools reading) so that's an added bonus, tape the game, maybe see yo'self on tv.
Our analysis checks for this Saturday will include:
Monstro - with modified deck flanges, I-Beam NDSU style I guess you could say, but the geometric centroidal depth in SAP will go up 1/2". Sweet.
Big Vs - again with I-beam like tubular flanges.
Chichen Itza - with the new flanges again.
Matt will also develop his "Lowrider" beam deck - it will be a special case, and hopefully, he can organize a trial loading of the PDM Model very soon to see if it's worth it. This will be our first beam-style analysis.
BASIC rule of thumb for analysis to final product, is that the shallower your bridge is, the smaller the margin is for error. Deeper bridges tend to deflect closer to that analyzed. We may have to elevate the pin connections atop the piers for the beam to be effective.
Okay, ramble on! I know.
See you Saturday -- again, good luck with continuing mid-terms.
And so we design and analyze on! Remember to read the construction rules AND clarifications.

Having dreams is common, being crazy enough to make them reality, that's Chrome Ollie.
Saturday, November 11, 2006
Two new ones 11/11
Sweet day of analysii today.
The Monstro and the Everest were analyzed today. Both have their good aspects, especially Everest, it's very buildable with a few extra bolts at midspan. Monstro looked good despite it's lack of depth.
On advice from Jessica, we'll try the Big V's a bit shallower to see how it performs, we need to reach up top, and quite frankly we've only got one 6 footer on the Team right now.
Tuesday, November 14th at 6:10 p.m. is our next meeting. We'll meet in the Chrome Ollie Loft in 1203 Bainer Hall. Discussion will include the numbers for all four trusses we've looked at so far, we need to talk constructability concerns, lateral arrangements, and sequence, because that will most likely determine the final decision. After making a decision here in the next couple of weeks, we need to concentrate on building the best bridge possible and then get it ready for practice at San Jo this April.
On the football front: NDSU killed Cal Poly, Sac State lost to Matt's hometown PSU Vikings. The Cal Poly loss is bad for the Aggies, as it makes Univ. of San Diego look better to the I-AA playoff committee. UC Davis has already agreed to bow out of the Nov. 25th contest with the Toreros in the event that they make the playoffs (we are playoff ineligible until next year). Right now we're at 4-5, and a win against Sac State and USD would ensure our 38th consecutive winning season. So everybody needs to show up at Toomey on the 18th for the 53rd Causeway Classic, after that, it's in the committee's hands as to whether or not USD will come to town...not that anybody will be there, it's Thanksgiving.
Design/Analyze on...
p.s. - Granite just chipped in for $2000 - this means we might be able to buy those test girders from PDM. Matt will get the quote from PDM on that, while Jessica checks with Dillsburg on those sizes to see if we get to go into a deeper tinker on the best choices so far.
Excellent!
The Monstro and the Everest were analyzed today. Both have their good aspects, especially Everest, it's very buildable with a few extra bolts at midspan. Monstro looked good despite it's lack of depth.
On advice from Jessica, we'll try the Big V's a bit shallower to see how it performs, we need to reach up top, and quite frankly we've only got one 6 footer on the Team right now.
Tuesday, November 14th at 6:10 p.m. is our next meeting. We'll meet in the Chrome Ollie Loft in 1203 Bainer Hall. Discussion will include the numbers for all four trusses we've looked at so far, we need to talk constructability concerns, lateral arrangements, and sequence, because that will most likely determine the final decision. After making a decision here in the next couple of weeks, we need to concentrate on building the best bridge possible and then get it ready for practice at San Jo this April.
On the football front: NDSU killed Cal Poly, Sac State lost to Matt's hometown PSU Vikings. The Cal Poly loss is bad for the Aggies, as it makes Univ. of San Diego look better to the I-AA playoff committee. UC Davis has already agreed to bow out of the Nov. 25th contest with the Toreros in the event that they make the playoffs (we are playoff ineligible until next year). Right now we're at 4-5, and a win against Sac State and USD would ensure our 38th consecutive winning season. So everybody needs to show up at Toomey on the 18th for the 53rd Causeway Classic, after that, it's in the committee's hands as to whether or not USD will come to town...not that anybody will be there, it's Thanksgiving.
Design/Analyze on...
p.s. - Granite just chipped in for $2000 - this means we might be able to buy those test girders from PDM. Matt will get the quote from PDM on that, while Jessica checks with Dillsburg on those sizes to see if we get to go into a deeper tinker on the best choices so far.
Excellent!
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
Struts
This may have been previously stated, but here it is again.
Don't know who's reading this, if anybody at all...from Davis let alone across the country.
DON'T USE STRUTS (or more simply - angled braces going from bottom of pier to underdeck and/or up into the truss). All they do is kick out the bottom of your free standing foundation and cause more rotation/moment into the critical areas at midspan. Keep it flat, even hinged if possible. Do not strut, no matter what John Travolta says, it's a waste of time and energy. Focus your efforts into keeping a truss or a beam as flat as possible. If you do anything, batter your piers like they do on highway bridges, do not strut.
Don't know who's reading this, if anybody at all...from Davis let alone across the country.
DON'T USE STRUTS (or more simply - angled braces going from bottom of pier to underdeck and/or up into the truss). All they do is kick out the bottom of your free standing foundation and cause more rotation/moment into the critical areas at midspan. Keep it flat, even hinged if possible. Do not strut, no matter what John Travolta says, it's a waste of time and energy. Focus your efforts into keeping a truss or a beam as flat as possible. If you do anything, batter your piers like they do on highway bridges, do not strut.
Tuesday, November 07, 2006
November 7th
Well, it's election night, if you haven't voted and are reading this at 8:05 pm then it's too late. Shame on you for not voting!!!
Looks like Dems are taking a few more seats, whether or not they gain control of the House and/or Senate we'll see after tonight.
On the Steel Bridge front:
We analyzed on Saturday, November 4th, before the NDSU game (which we lost in heartbreak fashion due to an uninspired 2nd half). The two bridges were the Chichen Itza Truss and the Big V's. Both are very deep and buildable, they both gave great numbers, some a little, ummm, TOO great, so upon further investigation there were definitely some input errors. It's okay though, it was a tough assignment for first time analyzers. Jessica and Matt will reinput each bridge and check the beginning values for each design. In all there were about 40 or 50 scenarios total for all 6 bridge variations of these two designs.
This Saturday, November 11th, we'll be at it again with two new fresh designs, maybe three, if Matt can find some time in an ever-expanding schedule (thanks Thai Bobby). They'll be much, much simpler, so the new analysis team can get some confidence, but don't think they're insignificant, because they may very well end up being our design choice.
So, Saturday, Nov. 11th, at 10 a.m. in the Chrome Ollie Loft of 1203 Bainer Hall.
Take it easy, good luck with continuing mid-terms!!!
Looks like Dems are taking a few more seats, whether or not they gain control of the House and/or Senate we'll see after tonight.
On the Steel Bridge front:
We analyzed on Saturday, November 4th, before the NDSU game (which we lost in heartbreak fashion due to an uninspired 2nd half). The two bridges were the Chichen Itza Truss and the Big V's. Both are very deep and buildable, they both gave great numbers, some a little, ummm, TOO great, so upon further investigation there were definitely some input errors. It's okay though, it was a tough assignment for first time analyzers. Jessica and Matt will reinput each bridge and check the beginning values for each design. In all there were about 40 or 50 scenarios total for all 6 bridge variations of these two designs.
This Saturday, November 11th, we'll be at it again with two new fresh designs, maybe three, if Matt can find some time in an ever-expanding schedule (thanks Thai Bobby). They'll be much, much simpler, so the new analysis team can get some confidence, but don't think they're insignificant, because they may very well end up being our design choice.
So, Saturday, Nov. 11th, at 10 a.m. in the Chrome Ollie Loft of 1203 Bainer Hall.
Take it easy, good luck with continuing mid-terms!!!
Tuesday, October 31, 2006
Halloween Mtg. & 11/4 Analysis
10/31
Happy Halloween everybody!
Real quickly today we talked about two truss designs we're going to analyze this Saturday before the Aggies take on North Dakota State at the Toom. They're primarily built for speed, and have a LOT of construction options on them, as well as a stellar structural profile. If they analyze well, we may very well have finished our truss analysis for the season. Kickoff for the game is 1:05 p.m. local.
Open bay beams will be analyzed in conjunction with the structural optimization class (ECI 153) on campus. Chosen for their relative simplicity (and absolute boringness), the class should be able to spit some numbers back at us, that we more or less already know. The key to the beams functioning structurally, as with any design, but moreso on beams, is their connection solidarity. They may even have to be structurally bolted to work well, dovetails may leave too much play. Then there's the idea of multiple beam-type bridges.
So...this Saturday, 11/4, at 9:30 a.m. we'll meet in the Chrome Ollie Loft in 1203 Bainer Hall, then trek over to EUIII on the 3rd floor student labs where we will input AutoCAD wireframes in SAP 2000 and analyze those two truss designs with the section sizes we think we can get our hands on in 4130 alloy. We may have to hit up the mother supplier in Dillsburg to find what we need and/or want. i.e. wide/thin-wall material. The SAP procedure is pretty simple, it's step by step, and the more you do it the more you'll see how easy it is.
Jessica will work on OT collars soon. They're pretty basic lathe stuff, nothing fancy, but we need to get tolerances down to acceptable levels now, so it won't stall us this winter.
Okay then, time to start charging ahead, let's continue to think and be creative, we have a lot to decide on in the next 5 weeks...
Happy Halloween everybody!
Real quickly today we talked about two truss designs we're going to analyze this Saturday before the Aggies take on North Dakota State at the Toom. They're primarily built for speed, and have a LOT of construction options on them, as well as a stellar structural profile. If they analyze well, we may very well have finished our truss analysis for the season. Kickoff for the game is 1:05 p.m. local.
Open bay beams will be analyzed in conjunction with the structural optimization class (ECI 153) on campus. Chosen for their relative simplicity (and absolute boringness), the class should be able to spit some numbers back at us, that we more or less already know. The key to the beams functioning structurally, as with any design, but moreso on beams, is their connection solidarity. They may even have to be structurally bolted to work well, dovetails may leave too much play. Then there's the idea of multiple beam-type bridges.
So...this Saturday, 11/4, at 9:30 a.m. we'll meet in the Chrome Ollie Loft in 1203 Bainer Hall, then trek over to EUIII on the 3rd floor student labs where we will input AutoCAD wireframes in SAP 2000 and analyze those two truss designs with the section sizes we think we can get our hands on in 4130 alloy. We may have to hit up the mother supplier in Dillsburg to find what we need and/or want. i.e. wide/thin-wall material. The SAP procedure is pretty simple, it's step by step, and the more you do it the more you'll see how easy it is.
Jessica will work on OT collars soon. They're pretty basic lathe stuff, nothing fancy, but we need to get tolerances down to acceptable levels now, so it won't stall us this winter.
Okay then, time to start charging ahead, let's continue to think and be creative, we have a lot to decide on in the next 5 weeks...
Friday, October 27, 2006
10/24 Meeting & THIS Saturday
Hey gang,
On Tuesday, 10/24 we had a Rules quiz. We covered the absolute fundamental things everybody on the Team needs to know in the Quiz. Basic dimensions and design envelope, member requirements, some basic construction considerations, as well as others.
Correct answers got rewarded with some nice Scooby Snacks, wrong answers were punished with the usual caning across the back. Despite the punishment, most everybody was willing to try for the answer, which was refreshing.
THIS Saturday 10/28 at 10 a.m. -- we'll have a very serious and considerate design/analysis meeting. Hopefully, Matt will have design packages ready for analysis, as well as design folders for each new member detailing the many bridge types we have on the platter this fall. Analysis should go quickly once we get going as it has been streamlined to the bare necessities over the past 4 seasons...now it's just a matter of monitoring weight (including weld and connection weight), and fine tuning the fabrication process yet again.
Notes on fab:
1. We're going to try to get that girder/or truss deck up to it's maximum depth possible. This will require a mock up model of the new, uber-efficient dovetail design with the advanced alloy form Pierce-Spafford or ABC in Sac.
2. We need to plan for the possibility of a floor-flat welding procedure of a truss if that design is chosen. The NDSU procedure looked awesome, it's like doing a beam, just on a bigger scale, and it will alleviate the need for excess clamping (though there is not such a thing), but it will help keep things from falling on our craniums.
3. Need to make OT collars.
4. Need to re-examine Dovetail redundancy :(i.e. fab/test/research/analysis/results/implementation of new sizes) -- added depth means less axial force, so we don't need as much DT mass as before. Beams are another story.
Okay, one day at a time, non-stop, push to perfection, Unity! (yes, I'm doing the Dave Chappelle voice) Chrome Ollie por vida.
p.s. - for the unmotivated: Chico beat us at Nationals last season, let alone 7 other teams, GET ASSIGNMENTS, GET IN THE LAB, GET IN THE SHOP!!! GET 'ER DONE!
On Tuesday, 10/24 we had a Rules quiz. We covered the absolute fundamental things everybody on the Team needs to know in the Quiz. Basic dimensions and design envelope, member requirements, some basic construction considerations, as well as others.
Correct answers got rewarded with some nice Scooby Snacks, wrong answers were punished with the usual caning across the back. Despite the punishment, most everybody was willing to try for the answer, which was refreshing.
THIS Saturday 10/28 at 10 a.m. -- we'll have a very serious and considerate design/analysis meeting. Hopefully, Matt will have design packages ready for analysis, as well as design folders for each new member detailing the many bridge types we have on the platter this fall. Analysis should go quickly once we get going as it has been streamlined to the bare necessities over the past 4 seasons...now it's just a matter of monitoring weight (including weld and connection weight), and fine tuning the fabrication process yet again.
Notes on fab:
1. We're going to try to get that girder/or truss deck up to it's maximum depth possible. This will require a mock up model of the new, uber-efficient dovetail design with the advanced alloy form Pierce-Spafford or ABC in Sac.
2. We need to plan for the possibility of a floor-flat welding procedure of a truss if that design is chosen. The NDSU procedure looked awesome, it's like doing a beam, just on a bigger scale, and it will alleviate the need for excess clamping (though there is not such a thing), but it will help keep things from falling on our craniums.
3. Need to make OT collars.
4. Need to re-examine Dovetail redundancy :(i.e. fab/test/research/analysis/results/implementation of new sizes) -- added depth means less axial force, so we don't need as much DT mass as before. Beams are another story.
Okay, one day at a time, non-stop, push to perfection, Unity! (yes, I'm doing the Dave Chappelle voice) Chrome Ollie por vida.
p.s. - for the unmotivated: Chico beat us at Nationals last season, let alone 7 other teams, GET ASSIGNMENTS, GET IN THE LAB, GET IN THE SHOP!!! GET 'ER DONE!
Wednesday, October 18, 2006
10/17 general meeting # 2 notes
Alrighty!
We talked a little about construction first thing on Tuesday. We went over the basics of the site plan, staging areas, rivers, penalties etc. etc. After getting a look at the 2005 site plan, we watched the UC Davis 2005 construction run in Orlando, all 3 min. and 38 seconds of it, point out some basic rules, tool ideas, penalty concerns, what's different fom that year to this year, and basically got a feel for how the construction run goes.
After watching the 2005 UC Davis run, we watched the 2006 University of Florida run from Gainesville. We discussed the main rule changes from 2005 to 2006, how the course was different, and asymmetry played a part in the construction sequence, the need to make things reachable, yet keep the bridge stiff as a whole, etc. etc.
When film was concluded, we went out to the front of Bainer to check out the 2007 Construction course, got a feel for the size of it, the distances needed to be travelled, the friggin' walls that will be in the way, the bigger pier boxes, the 9 foot river, the basic span length and lack of skew as in the previous (2K5 & 2K6) years. Questions were answered, and then we moved on to a design rant by Matt.
Matt explained the basics of bridge design which primarily are driven by the Scoring. We noted how Construction as well as Structural Efficiency measured the value of a bridge. Both of these issues must be addressed to have a good bridge.
Going from the bottom up, or simplest to most complex, some bridge ideas were set forth by Matt, from beams, to stacked beams, to multiple beams. to trusses, the bridge type selection will be an interesting choice.
Connections, Analysis Methods, Scoring Scenarios, Steel Sizes we typically use, and Member Layouts will all be discussed next time, Tuesday, October, 24th, at 6:10 pm starting in 1213 Bainer. There will also be a Rules quiz, with a reward for the Top 5 Scores, ties included!
Analysis will also start Saturday, October 28th, in EUIII, we'll pick some bridges on Tuesday, the 24th for analysis, and we'll go through the basic SAP2000 input procedure. Anybody wishing to stay and optimize is welcome to on Sat the 28th!!!
Okay, that's it for now, READ THOSE RULES, highlight them if it helps, if you have questions, email the captains or email the rules committee on the AISC website below (just go to Question Submittal Form), though for basic stuff I'm sure returners can answer the Q's just fine:
http://www.aisc.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Learning_Opportunities/University_Programs/Student_Competitions1/AISC_Student_Steel_Bridge_Competition/Default329.htm
We talked a little about construction first thing on Tuesday. We went over the basics of the site plan, staging areas, rivers, penalties etc. etc. After getting a look at the 2005 site plan, we watched the UC Davis 2005 construction run in Orlando, all 3 min. and 38 seconds of it, point out some basic rules, tool ideas, penalty concerns, what's different fom that year to this year, and basically got a feel for how the construction run goes.
After watching the 2005 UC Davis run, we watched the 2006 University of Florida run from Gainesville. We discussed the main rule changes from 2005 to 2006, how the course was different, and asymmetry played a part in the construction sequence, the need to make things reachable, yet keep the bridge stiff as a whole, etc. etc.
When film was concluded, we went out to the front of Bainer to check out the 2007 Construction course, got a feel for the size of it, the distances needed to be travelled, the friggin' walls that will be in the way, the bigger pier boxes, the 9 foot river, the basic span length and lack of skew as in the previous (2K5 & 2K6) years. Questions were answered, and then we moved on to a design rant by Matt.
Matt explained the basics of bridge design which primarily are driven by the Scoring. We noted how Construction as well as Structural Efficiency measured the value of a bridge. Both of these issues must be addressed to have a good bridge.
Going from the bottom up, or simplest to most complex, some bridge ideas were set forth by Matt, from beams, to stacked beams, to multiple beams. to trusses, the bridge type selection will be an interesting choice.
Connections, Analysis Methods, Scoring Scenarios, Steel Sizes we typically use, and Member Layouts will all be discussed next time, Tuesday, October, 24th, at 6:10 pm starting in 1213 Bainer. There will also be a Rules quiz, with a reward for the Top 5 Scores, ties included!
Analysis will also start Saturday, October 28th, in EUIII, we'll pick some bridges on Tuesday, the 24th for analysis, and we'll go through the basic SAP2000 input procedure. Anybody wishing to stay and optimize is welcome to on Sat the 28th!!!
Okay, that's it for now, READ THOSE RULES, highlight them if it helps, if you have questions, email the captains or email the rules committee on the AISC website below (just go to Question Submittal Form), though for basic stuff I'm sure returners can answer the Q's just fine:
http://www.aisc.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Learning_Opportunities/University_Programs/Student_Competitions1/AISC_Student_Steel_Bridge_Competition/Default329.htm
Tuesday, October 10, 2006
New Stuff
10/10 Tuesday General Meeting was great. A lot of young blood showed up, and we got to talk a little bit about the competition, what it involves, and the need to read and understand the Rules. We also took a look at last year's Bridge and answered some design/analysis/fabrication questions.
Next Meeting will again be on Tuesday, 10/17, at 6:10 p.m. in 1213 Bainer (and later out in front of Bainer Hall - on the East side of the building).
We'll head out to the front of Bainer and get a look at the 2007 Construction site, maybe watch some film and answer some more questions. We'll probably start talking design and analysis very soon too, most likely Saturday 10/21!
Hope to see everyone again, hang in there!
Next Meeting will again be on Tuesday, 10/17, at 6:10 p.m. in 1213 Bainer (and later out in front of Bainer Hall - on the East side of the building).
We'll head out to the front of Bainer and get a look at the 2007 Construction site, maybe watch some film and answer some more questions. We'll probably start talking design and analysis very soon too, most likely Saturday 10/21!
Hope to see everyone again, hang in there!
ICE CREAM SOCIAL, THUR, 10/14
College of Engineering Ice Cream Social:
Thursday, October 12, 2006. 2:30 - 4 p.m. Kemper Courtyard.
We'll have the 2006 Bridge up and on display.
Matt will be there to help set up, anybody else, meet in the Bridge room at around 1:45 pm.
Thursday, October 12, 2006. 2:30 - 4 p.m. Kemper Courtyard.
We'll have the 2006 Bridge up and on display.
Matt will be there to help set up, anybody else, meet in the Bridge room at around 1:45 pm.
Friday, September 29, 2006
October starters
Phil and Matt discussed three different design philosophies at the Raiders vs. Browns game on Sunday. All would probably work for this year's bridge. The question is how efficient can a beam be at ~ 7 1/4" depth...8 1/2" depth (stacked?)? Fabrication and advanced planning will have to be at the forefront of the project decisions we're going to make in the next 8 weeks.
Design Meeting Thursday 10/5 right after the ASCE BBQ. Discuss bridge type selection, connections, but mainly construction issues concerns and tool/pier scenarios.
First General Meeting that will include all possible new members is set for:
Tuesday, 10/10, at 6:10 p.m. in 1213 Bainer Hall
-- no Wildcats, Hornets or Cal Bears allowed :-p
Design Meeting Thursday 10/5 right after the ASCE BBQ. Discuss bridge type selection, connections, but mainly construction issues concerns and tool/pier scenarios.
First General Meeting that will include all possible new members is set for:
Tuesday, 10/10, at 6:10 p.m. in 1213 Bainer Hall
-- no Wildcats, Hornets or Cal Bears allowed :-p
Tuesday, September 26, 2006
9/28 Mtg.
"Hey everyone, we've spoken with Dr. Cheng about setting up a directed study ECI 199 class for bridge and canoe. We would meet once a week, for an hour, either Monday, Wednesday or Friday at 6pm to discuss design issues (we'll split the time with canoe). If anyone is interested in signing up let me know which evening you'd prefer and if there's an evening you have a conflict. Also, Team meeting this Thursday at 6pm in the bridge room." - Jessica
Tuesday, September 12, 2006
September rush
Chrome Ollie will be starting up their formal/informal design sessions very quickly here. Captains are Jessica Revell and Phil Weeks. Jessica will be working in the shop for the next couple of weeks developing collar style connections for the truss, if we choose such a design, on the lathe. We bought some 4130 alloy chrome-moly stock a month ago for this.
Phil and Matt are discussing sheet metal options and increasing the active length, or development length, of each dovetail connection to better stiffness for a beam. If possible, we're trying to get the design down to a beamlike structure for quicker assembly. We don't want to go above 1.2" deflection if we can squeeze 2 or 3 minutes out of construction. If the PDM field test proves that a beam may work if connected properly, then we may very well use it, if not, one of the three truss design philosophies we have will go into further development. The basis for the truss will first be assembly, then lightness, and assuming the stiffnesses are comparable, then stiffness.
Recruitment will also be prominent this fall, as only a few people, if anybody, will be back for the '07-'08 season. Need to organize talks in ECI 131, ECI 135, ECI 171, ECI 179, and ENG104 for sure, perhaps some others in the Mechanical Department as well if we can get a MechE to do it. The Raiders got beat very badly yesterday, I guess they were busy remembering 9/11.
Phil and Matt are discussing sheet metal options and increasing the active length, or development length, of each dovetail connection to better stiffness for a beam. If possible, we're trying to get the design down to a beamlike structure for quicker assembly. We don't want to go above 1.2" deflection if we can squeeze 2 or 3 minutes out of construction. If the PDM field test proves that a beam may work if connected properly, then we may very well use it, if not, one of the three truss design philosophies we have will go into further development. The basis for the truss will first be assembly, then lightness, and assuming the stiffnesses are comparable, then stiffness.
Recruitment will also be prominent this fall, as only a few people, if anybody, will be back for the '07-'08 season. Need to organize talks in ECI 131, ECI 135, ECI 171, ECI 179, and ENG104 for sure, perhaps some others in the Mechanical Department as well if we can get a MechE to do it. The Raiders got beat very badly yesterday, I guess they were busy remembering 9/11.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


